A Republican congressman from Tennessee, Scott DesJarlais, has called for a constitutional amendment that would require presidential and vice-presidential candidates to demonstrate cognitive competence.
The amendment would also give Congress the authority to enforce this requirement through appropriate legislation. DesJarlais believes that cognitive competence is an important requirement for all Americans to have in their leaders, regardless of political party.
This amendment has come about partly as a result of presidential candidate Nikki Haley’s recent call for mental competency tests for politicians over the age of 75.
Haley suggested that it was time for “permanent politicians” to retire and make way for a new generation of leaders. The age of politicians has become a topic of discussion recently, especially given the age of President Biden, who is 80 years old and would be 82 if he served a second term.
Former President Trump is also 76 years old. Senator Dianne Feinstein, who is 89, recently resigned amid concerns about her declining mental acuity.
DesJarlais, who is a former doctor, has been working with the GOP Doctors Caucus to develop legislation that outlines the tests that would be required to judge when presidential and vice-presidential candidates are “cognitively competent.” He is also setting up a committee of doctors to ensure that the tests are administered in a nonpartisan way.
While some argue that the amendment is unnecessary and could be used to exclude certain candidates unfairly, DesJarlais argues that cognitive competence is a crucial requirement for leaders. The ability to make sound judgments, remember important details, and communicate effectively are all essential skills for a president or vice president.
This issue has become more important as people live longer and remain active well into their later years. It is becoming increasingly important to ensure that our leaders are mentally sharp and capable of making important decisions.
By requiring candidates to demonstrate cognitive competence, we can be sure that our leaders are up to the task of governing the country.
In conclusion, the issue of cognitive competence is an important one for voters to consider when choosing their leaders. It is essential that our leaders have the ability to make sound judgments, remember important details, and communicate effectively.
While some may argue that this amendment is unnecessary or could be used unfairly, DesJarlais and others believe that it is a crucial requirement for leaders. By requiring candidates to demonstrate cognitive competence, we can be sure that our leaders are up to the task of governing the country.
